The zebra-like, black-and-white, elongated shrug keeps disappearing from the rack at the flagship Barneys New York store on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. To customers, the incredibly soft and warmer-than-wool sweater is a must-have, even though most have no idea what the hangtag means by "Alpaca" or "Rogan."
Rogan is actually an avant-garde line by Rogan Gregory, whose various ventures -- from denim to furniture -- are businesses with an eco-friendly bent. The designer is best known for his high-end organic denim line Loomstate, and his collaboration with rockstar Bono's Edun collection.
Made of fur from free-range Alpacas (multicolor, sheep-like llama cousins, native to Peru) handspun into yarn, Gregory's popular sweater is knit with naturally black and white yarn so no toxic dyes are used to achieve its two-tone look. With herders continuingly breeding out the non-white species due to underwhelming demand (white fleece is easier to dye and therefore more commercially viable), Gregory uses the sweater to bring awareness to this inhumane practice as part of his "Save Our Colored Brother" campaign.
This sweater, and not some burlap sac rescued from the trash can by granola-eating hippies, is the essence of green fashion. What sets eco-fashion apart from conventionally produced garments is the environmental, ethical and even social considerations weaved into the design of each piece. It can be as simple as using a sustainable fabric like organic cotton and donating proceeds to an earth-friendly charity, or as extensive as providing ethical employment to offshore factory workers. Across the entire fashion spectrum, from accessories to haute couture, designers are finding ways to incorporate their green lifestyles into their work.
Of course, not every brand is as considerate of its eco-impact as Rogan. Without any certification or governing bodies overseeing the greening of the fashion industry, any label with any degree of eco-ambition can color itself, well, green. This means companies that use recycled paper hangtags are on the same eco-platform as those running on wind-power. For example, Banana Republic recently launched a 50-piece green collection. The pieces push all the right buttons -- their 100 percent recycled paper price tags have names like "Bamboo Printed Wrap" and "Leaf Tee" -- but as may often be the case, the actual clothing may not be made in an eco-friendly production process or even from sustainable materials. Besides, would the average shopper at the local mall even know the difference?
"It's a catch 22," says Alice Demirijian, Director of Fashion Marketing at Parsons at The New School. "To be truly sustainable is to buy less." Designers are well aware they need to educate consumers to make a business out of sustainable fashion. Not only do they need to differentiate themselves from other green designers (especially from eco-posers), and spread the word about the virtues of greening the industry, they also need to compete with non-eco-products, which tend to be more reasonably priced. This is why marketing is key for these labels. But there is a difference between informing customers and outright fibbing about environmental claims, also known as greenwashing. According to many environmentalists and critics of this practice, marketers often employ tactics that paint products greener than they actually are.
As more and more mass retailers like Wal-Mart and the Gap jump on the green fashion bandwagon, they're looking to established indie labels for direction and inspiration. greenKarat jewelry, Olivia Luca couture, and Mink shoes may not be household names, but their success is proving to mainstream brands that going green is good for business.
Comment
Recent Comments | 6 Total
May 29, 2008 at 10:57am
Michael De'ShazerComplete marketing hype. It makes the sales. They are drawing on the newly-found sensibilities of a culture of green freaks. Thank you Gore. This is not sarcastic. Im really happy about all this, although I'm wondering how "going green" as a culture is becoming a bit of a pretentious group of Chai-Latte toting Fifth Avenuers and Suburban housewives...
May 29, 2008 at 2:02pm
Nicole ValentinoMaybe 5 or 10 years ago being green was only for pretentious latte drinkers, but today, anyone can get in on the deal, which is great. If Barney's is carrying a line of green fashions, more power to them. Anyway, are chai-latte's still pretentious?
May 29, 2008 at 2:41pm
Darren ShieldSure for some of the big players it might just be hype for now, but I think the shift to a strong environmental conciousness on a global level that is spurring this capitilization will drive this to become a fundamental shift for the fashion industry. If the designers and consumers are on board, the decision makers will have to take notice... if they themselves aren't swayed by the green revolution themselves!
May 30, 2008 at 12:44am
Jo NelgaddeI actually think "green fashion" awaiting a backlash very soon. This is akin to biofuels once embraced by environmentalists and green-wannabes alike and touted as good for the people. Now biofuels are bearing the brunt of the anger felt by many who feel that they're making the already-bad global foos crisis even worse. Million of people are starving and food which can feed them is instead being used to make fuel (which really hasn't proven to be THAT cost-effective and environmentally friendly). Same goes for green-fashion. Same food which could go to feeding those millions is instead used to make some clothes??? This defies global social responsibility and very ironic.
May 31, 2008 at 4:58am
Darren ShieldI don't think the analogy fits. "Green" is a very broad appellation being attached to many things. Green fashion isn't about switching to a scare commodity, its about sustainability. Instead of growing cotton, grow hemp or bamboo (that farm is just switching what its producing), or like greenKarat, aiming at recycling existing material instead of going out and mining more gold. I fail to see where the backlash will come from. Sure there may be some unforeseen counter-productive results as there were with biofuels, but its certainly not the removal of already scare material.
Comment